As a federal advisory panel met Monday to review how the United States monitors vaccine safety, the discussion in Washington echoed a debate unfolding in pediatric offices and living rooms across North Carolina: How much trust parents should place in the childhood vaccine schedule and who gets to decide when that trust is strained?
The meeting, hosted by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, focused on vaccine safety monitoring systems, including V-safe, a voluntary program that allows people to report how they feel after receiving certain vaccines. Federal officials emphasized that V-safe is one of several tools used to track side effects and identify potential safety signals, alongside more formal surveillance systems.
Other WRAL Top Stories
The review comes as vaccine policy faces renewed scrutiny nationally, with signals from federal leadership that long-standing childhood vaccine recommendations could be revisited. Some proposals have pointed to countries like Denmark, which require fewer childhood immunizations, though public health experts caution that such comparisons often overlook differences in health care systems and disease risk.
For some parents, the debate reflects doubts they have carried for years.
Kelly Chiarelly, a mother of three who lived in Garner before moving to Florida, said she began questioning the vaccine schedule when her oldest child was an infant. She ultimately chose to space out vaccines rather than follow the recommended timing, a decision she said felt more intuitive to her as a parent.
When she looked at the number of shots recommended early in life, Chiarelly said it felt overwhelming. She said the COVID-19 pandemic further eroded her trust, leaving her skeptical of public health guidance that seemed to shift quickly.
Chiarelly said she does not oppose parents who vaccinate their children but wants space for questions without feeling judged or dismissed. She described wanting clearer explanations and more time to weigh decisions for her family.
Pediatricians say those concerns have become increasingly common, and increasingly consequential.
Dr. Lori Langdon, a general pediatrician of 30 years and clinical chair of pediatrics at Campbell University’s School of Osteopathic Medicine, said vaccine hesitancy has grown in recent years, fueled by misinformation online and intensified during the pandemic.
When trust breaks down, Langdon said, the effects extend beyond individual families. They ripple through communities, especially affecting infants and children who are too young or too medically vulnerable to be vaccinated.
Langdon said the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule is based on decades of research and is designed around when children are most at risk for serious illness and when vaccines are most effective.
She pointed to measles as a clear example. Federal officials told the advisory panel that the U.S. has recorded more than 1,900 measles cases this year, the highest number since 1992. Most cases have occurred in unvaccinated children or those with unknown vaccination status.
Influenza has also taken a heavy toll. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported 280 pediatric flu deaths nationwide during the most recent season, the highest number recorded in a nonpandemic year. In North Carolina, health officials have confirmed that at least one child in Western North Carolina has already died from flu this year.
“These are not abstract statistics,” Langdon said. “These are real children, real families.”
Related: Comparing flu, COVID, cold and RSV: Understanding the differences and how to protect yourself
Langdon also addressed confusion around vaccine safety monitoring systems like V-safe. She said such tools are designed to detect patterns that may warrant further study, not to determine whether a vaccine caused a specific medical condition.
“They help us know where to look more closely,” she said. “They don’t replace clinical trials or decades of safety data.”
Federal officials echoed that message during Monday’s meeting, noting that V-safe relies on self-reported information and must be interpreted alongside other data sources.
The broader discussion about potentially changing the vaccine schedule concerns pediatricians who fear it could further undermine confidence at a time when vaccine-preventable diseases are resurging.
Every drop in vaccination rates, Langdon said, increases the risk of outbreaks and puts the most vulnerable children at greater risk.
For parents like Chiarelly, the debate feels personal rather than political. She said she hopes doctors and policymakers will listen more closely to parents’ concerns, even when they disagree.
For doctors like Langdon, the challenge is acknowledging fear without minimizing it, while still emphasizing the real dangers of delaying or skipping vaccines.
Between those perspectives lies a growing tension that Monday’s meeting made clear. The question facing the nation is no longer only how vaccines are monitored, but whether trust in the system guiding those decisions can be rebuilt.